3KDré
Full Member
- Joined
- Feb 24, 2015
- Messages
- 6,659
....By the looks of it, there's no point playing him in the first half of games.
....By the looks of it, there's no point playing him in the first half of games.
Essentially this.I know he's got some assists and that's great, but when you watch the entire 90 minutes of each game he's played this season the majority of them is actually pretty poor. Spends far too long not doing a whole lot.
I know he's got some assists and that's great, but when you watch the entire 90 minutes of each game he's played this season the majority of them is actually pretty poor. Spends far too long not doing a whole lot.
Agreed, if we play with 3 midfield, I think Mata should have played rather than Mikhi, I remember in our best run of Van Gaal season both our left and right side create the triangle of Mata-Herrera-Valencia and Blind-Martial-Fellaini that actually played some of the best football in LVG's reign, Mikhi roam around too much and he almost never stay wide like Mata, and he does not have that good of understanding with Herrera and Valencia so both Herrera and Valencia left with nothing on the right side and the middle of the pitch becomes too crowdedWe need to play him as a ten. He's totally wasted and a bit useless out wide.
He makes Mata look like a giant.Literally the only positive thing he did today was that ball to Lukaku.
He does not offer enough imo
And I still don't understand how he's so weak in 50-50s and in possession.
And who do you play on the right? Neither Mata or Micky are wings, but Mata is better at playing the wing. They are both equally skilled (in different ways) at the #10 spot.Rubbish game again. In a weeks time everyone will point to his assist and claim he's playing well. Please, if you're gonna go with a 4-3-3 just play Martial and Rashford, if you go for a 4-2-3-1 put Mata at the 10, so much better than Mkhi.
I agree with the 4-3-3 part, but Mikhi is better than the "current" Mata at the number 10 role, regarding pace, productivity and everything really. Mata is better at moving the ball around, though.Rubbish game again. In a weeks time everyone will point to his assist and claim he's playing well. Please, if you're gonna go with a 4-3-3 just play Martial and Rashford, if you go for a 4-2-3-1 put Mata at the 10, so much better than Mkhi.
Well this game again showed what we already knew. Not a wide player, incredible ability to create chances (and contrary to the other posters here) I thought he had a 'decent' game because as you said before, he got on the ball in a lot difficult situations and helped the team assert control.Agreed. A more natural wide player on the right would do a world of good to Mkhi, playing at the center. We still have too many players demanding the ball, still very few actually providing the movement and the runs behind the defenders. About Nani, I get that you are biased towards him as he showed a lot of promise during his early days. But, his mentality and consistency always remained a question mark and was probably the only thing that prevented him from reaching world class status. If he had a mentality like Rashford, he would have certainly reached there, for in terms of pure skill and ability, he was almost Cristiano's level.