RAWK Goes Into Meltdown 2015-16 Edition

What if he's a Man Utd fan pretending to be a Liverpool fan pretending to be a Man Utd fan?
 
jose.gif


look at him, not even focused on the game

Is that the shit coat they are always on about?
 
'Man United are so 90's' :lol:

Pretty funny coming from a club seemingly intent on keeping the 70s alive.

I'd could settle for being 90s. After all, we did win a lot. Liverpool on the other hand are very modern day - where they win feck all :lol:
 
I can see the days of Ferguson returning,with deliberate hate stoked to create the siege mentality. Watch him try and poach our transfer interests.
 
Since we're "so 90s" now, here's a list of what we've won since 1999 turned into 2000:

League = 8
F.A. Cup = 2
League Cup = 3
Community Shield = 6
Champions League = 1
Club World Cup = 1

Imagine what we might've won if we weren't stuck two decades in the past?
 
yqEGojq.jpg


Let's keep a screen shot of that before its cleaned up.


He done fecked up.
 
Is that the shit coat they are always on about?
No. "Shitcoat" was actualy a mac by giorgio armani.

And it was the city fans who came up with the chant "your coat is from matalan", dippers just dont know when to retire a good joke.
 
Oh dear :lol:

What a surprise. Hope RAWK see this and call him out for being a weirdy, beardy, feck-mentalist.

I sincerely doubt it. RAWK is just a collection of inbred mentalists. They're seemingly oblivious to the fact that most footballing communities on the web ridicule them.

I mean, this is the same forum that had one of their mods caught a few years back for talking to himself on a seperate account that he had created. They're just not quite "with it". https://www.redcafe.net/threads/rawk-goes-into-meltdown-2012-2013.355423/page-16#post-12033451

Pheeny said:
to be honest I've not done a "steep" cobbled hill myself.Mate reckons the Muur Van Geraardsbergen is OK so long as you do it before the masses arrive.Then you can do it at your own pace without having to watch out for others.Another good hill close to me is the Côte de La Redoute. http://www.climbbybike.com/picture-...-Redoute&MountainID=395&Departure=Remouchamps
Pheeny on his second account said:
feck me Pheeny lad that's some hill...
 
He's not guilty (this time): he's only quoting John Henry's words from the club statement. He should've used inverted commas to make it clear though.
 
Apparently the Glazers getting Mourinho means that they are going to sell the club. Scouse logic, don't ask.
 
He directly quotes Henry's words - 'the unique and special relationship Kenny has with our supporters' - and then asks sarcastically why Henry treated Dalglish so badly if Henry valued the man so much.
 
Last edited:
He's not guilty (this time): he's only quoting John Henry's words from the club statement. He should've used inverted commas to make it clear though.

I wondered that, too. But, he starts with doing that & then forgets himself lower down isn't it? So that 'our' is there twice or something?

After forensic analysis, it's not totally conclusive for me.

I also did wonder if it was A@A cos of the style, cliches usage (someone said this earlier) but the longevity of it, other sites before RAWK wasn't it? As long as he's enjoying himself, either way, and we are too, everyone's a winner. Silly old sausage.
 
The delusion on that board hurts my brain, two new signings for them and the cycle has already started.

I think the worry is creeping in a huge manager, at a club much bigger than theirs.

The funniest thing for me in the past 2 years is the new Liverpool Stadium looks like Old Trafford from the inside.

It just makes me smile inside. I don't like to identify hugely with any club, I watch football for fun, but I was raised a United fan... I like to watch the big games and see the passion of the fans but Liverpool there's some special delusion always going on.
 
I wondered that, too. But, he starts with doing that & then forgets himself lower down isn't it? So that 'our' is there twice or something?

After forensic analysis, it's not totally conclusive for me.

I also did wonder if it was A@A cos of the style, cliches usage (someone said this earlier) but the longevity of it, other sites before RAWK wasn't it? As long as he's enjoying himself, either way, and we are too, everyone's a winner. Silly old sausage.
Yeah, it could be A@A, mate, although Andy's stuff is arguably more laughable. I'll never forget that one post of his about Liverpool v Villa at Anfield - according to Andy, Villa were the worst team in history and Liverpool were going to thrash them 6-0; Liverpool lost 3-1.